Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-09 21:02:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3CE4180E6E4EBBF752C6F25953655ED99B69E85E3C76380E4530294AB6412E37
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Historians continue to learn more about Watergate. Substantial, compelling, but not conclusive, evidence points to intelligence agencies' knowledge and involvement in the scandal. OP expresses an opinion based on compelling evidence. Link below is a credible source: https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2022/06/is-there-anything-to-learn-about-watergate-new-history-says-yes/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799566082946073045
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3CE4180E6E4EBBF752C6F25953655ED99B69E85E3C76380E4530294AB6412E37
  • createdAtMillis - 1731186154928
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17995660829460730453CE4180E6E4EBBF752C6F25953655ED99B69E85E3C76380E4530294AB6412E37