Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 21:32:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1A4B6C4C2C026A814040AE9A5228CC0C3699FBEAF2198235476F546416084928
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Historians continue to learn more about Watergate. Substantial, compelling, but not conclusive, evidence points to intelligence agencies' knowledge and involvement in the scandal. OP expresses an opinion based on compelling evidence. Link below is a credible source: https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2022/06/is-there-anything-to-learn-about-watergate-new-history-says-yes/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799566082946073045
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1A4B6C4C2C026A814040AE9A5228CC0C3699FBEAF2198235476F546416084928
  • createdAtMillis - 1717968743628
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17995660829460730451A4B6C4C2C026A814040AE9A5228CC0C3699FBEAF2198235476F546416084928