Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 14:48:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 11941BD441167A7A8A85DC9A0893ECFD1F4D4B0F2758CC5527878779029DE73D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Historians continue to learn more about Watergate. Substantial, compelling, but not conclusive, evidence points to intelligence agencies' knowledge and involvement in the scandal. OP expresses an opinion based on compelling evidence. Link below is a credible source: https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2022/06/is-there-anything-to-learn-about-watergate-new-history-says-yes/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799566082946073045
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 11941BD441167A7A8A85DC9A0893ECFD1F4D4B0F2758CC5527878779029DE73D
  • createdAtMillis - 1717944501783
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179956608294607304511941BD441167A7A8A85DC9A0893ECFD1F4D4B0F2758CC5527878779029DE73D