Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-08 23:22:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60851B301883AD394421832DBFFE09561CE3D4F178D3D88EB41D65A0D7C7AC1B
Participant Details

Original Note:

La notica engaña al lector. El juez peinado no está imputado. Y así se dice en la propia noticia. El plural engaña al lector con un titular manipulado https://www.elplural.com/politica/tsjm-admite-querella-contra-juez-peinado-revelacion-secretos_331411102

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799554107088199982
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 60851B301883AD394421832DBFFE09561CE3D4F178D3D88EB41D65A0D7C7AC1B
  • createdAtMillis - 1717888929055
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179955410708819998260851B301883AD394421832DBFFE09561CE3D4F178D3D88EB41D65A0D7C7AC1B