Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-08 21:39:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5A977E75ACD4A4B07EB8C69B5141D8B37D77DAB935D4492DD0E7D430ED8A0215
Participant Details

Original Note:

La notica engaña al lector. El juez peinado no está imputado. Y así se dice en la propia noticia. El plural engaña al lector con un titular manipulado https://www.elplural.com/politica/tsjm-admite-querella-contra-juez-peinado-revelacion-secretos_331411102

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799554107088199982
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5A977E75ACD4A4B07EB8C69B5141D8B37D77DAB935D4492DD0E7D430ED8A0215
  • createdAtMillis - 1717882745923
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17995541070881999825A977E75ACD4A4B07EB8C69B5141D8B37D77DAB935D4492DD0E7D430ED8A0215