Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 06:20:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D69DDF016780373DAED352BEB2E6D044E36C4B8EAC86D8976F935FAF71BB88E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is an unfounded accusation of bribery. There are ongoing probes into SCOTUS ethics but partisan politics cheapens any meaningful discussion. https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/senate-judiciary-supreme-court/2023/11/21/id/1143098/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799524207107162533
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D69DDF016780373DAED352BEB2E6D044E36C4B8EAC86D8976F935FAF71BB88E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1717914015579
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799524207107162533D69DDF016780373DAED352BEB2E6D044E36C4B8EAC86D8976F935FAF71BB88E9