Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 11:24:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E49B443DC08B59C5ED8C03460C92C67F75503B2F24104E8800883E97E26E1975
Participant Details

Original Note:

At this stage of litigation, the court must consider plaintiffs' assertions of fact to be true, and plaintiffs had alleged the Covid shot is a medical treatment, not a vaccine, because it does not prevent spread. The court has not ruled on the merits of the claims. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/06/07/22-55908.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799486001720775109
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E49B443DC08B59C5ED8C03460C92C67F75503B2F24104E8800883E97E26E1975
  • createdAtMillis - 1717932242461
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799486001720775109E49B443DC08B59C5ED8C03460C92C67F75503B2F24104E8800883E97E26E1975