Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 05:14:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0406C1F3B7150C45C6F1FBF7ABFCDA8F05520036150B2FA437CE4889718835AC
Participant Details

Original Note:

At this stage of litigation, the court must consider plaintiffs' assertions of fact to be true, and plaintiffs had alleged the Covid shot is a medical treatment, not a vaccine, because it does not prevent spread. The court has not ruled on the merits of the claims. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/06/07/22-55908.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799486001720775109
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0406C1F3B7150C45C6F1FBF7ABFCDA8F05520036150B2FA437CE4889718835AC
  • createdAtMillis - 1717910077326
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17994860017207751090406C1F3B7150C45C6F1FBF7ABFCDA8F05520036150B2FA437CE4889718835AC