Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-08 23:52:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D1773CA57D4FE63C9696E8DFD6726D00437572772FB7A6E3B2F621BBF91344F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Rien n'indique dans l'article cité plus haut que les otages étaient retenus chez des civils. Il s'agit d'une interprétation, cela biaise la note proposée.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799474137405984932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D1773CA57D4FE63C9696E8DFD6726D00437572772FB7A6E3B2F621BBF91344F1
  • createdAtMillis - 1717890751798
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799474137405984932D1773CA57D4FE63C9696E8DFD6726D00437572772FB7A6E3B2F621BBF91344F1