Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-08 21:08:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ADE4DC1CC823E14E42A3B50572FBC246B91396AE3361A8FBDF04A706F1C8EB4A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Rien n'indique dans l'article cité plus haut que les otages étaient retenus chez des civils. Il s'agit d'une interprétation, cela biaise la note proposée.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799474137405984932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ADE4DC1CC823E14E42A3B50572FBC246B91396AE3361A8FBDF04A706F1C8EB4A
  • createdAtMillis - 1717880931126
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799474137405984932ADE4DC1CC823E14E42A3B50572FBC246B91396AE3361A8FBDF04A706F1C8EB4A