Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-08 22:12:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8FE2F06C9C3093D928F095763CB94B4A5F4108F04B37C839025D4562F450636F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Rien n'indique dans l'article cité plus haut que les otages étaient retenus chez des civils. Il s'agit d'une interprétation, cela biaise la note proposée.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799474137405984932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8FE2F06C9C3093D928F095763CB94B4A5F4108F04B37C839025D4562F450636F
  • createdAtMillis - 1717884721464
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17994741374059849328FE2F06C9C3093D928F095763CB94B4A5F4108F04B37C839025D4562F450636F