Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-08 16:19:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58F0C12081816DD96B527F4F2C73C2D8C2C0775967E372490F3792BD36C44D93
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Rien n'indique dans l'article cité plus haut que les otages étaient retenus chez des civils. Il s'agit d'une interprétation, cela biaise la note proposée.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799474137405984932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58F0C12081816DD96B527F4F2C73C2D8C2C0775967E372490F3792BD36C44D93
  • createdAtMillis - 1717863597725
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179947413740598493258F0C12081816DD96B527F4F2C73C2D8C2C0775967E372490F3792BD36C44D93