Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-08 18:47:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0FBB7EF131299338F8C143119E3888127D284639D72D81446F3E372A2A9CB1A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Rien n'indique dans l'article cité plus haut que les otages étaient retenus chez des civils. Il s'agit d'une interprétation, cela biaise la note proposée.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799474137405984932
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0FBB7EF131299338F8C143119E3888127D284639D72D81446F3E372A2A9CB1A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1717872431846
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17994741374059849320FBB7EF131299338F8C143119E3888127D284639D72D81446F3E372A2A9CB1A5