Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-08 16:36:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AAD4331AB5C504AD4F0EDBAEE258C939EF5CDB53419213F8DAB589A2AC248AD3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The 9th Circuit did not strip mRNA shots of legal liability protection. The court found that the district Court misapplied Jacobson v Mass., vacated the district court’s order, and remanded the case for further proceedings under the correct legal standard. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/22-55908/22-55908-2024-06-07.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799412528616771919
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AAD4331AB5C504AD4F0EDBAEE258C939EF5CDB53419213F8DAB589A2AC248AD3
  • createdAtMillis - 1717864618109
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799412528616771919AAD4331AB5C504AD4F0EDBAEE258C939EF5CDB53419213F8DAB589A2AC248AD3