Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-08 21:05:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5DAD3F2DADF034C530A390A5A8291C8593292735C27060AD3A0E70EDED15BD61
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Ninth Circuit did not hold that the covid shot was not a vaccine. It held that the Plaintiffs adequately pleaded (in their Complaint) that it is not a vaccine and that this allegation, assumed to be true on a motion to dismiss, makes Jacobson distinguishable. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/06/07/22-55908.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799287758084841959
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5DAD3F2DADF034C530A390A5A8291C8593292735C27060AD3A0E70EDED15BD61
  • createdAtMillis - 1717880710956
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17992877580848419595DAD3F2DADF034C530A390A5A8291C8593292735C27060AD3A0E70EDED15BD61