Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 15:36:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4CE284A70254D19C7994A0C577621C475FE97BC48A7B9D961C4B92798DB5D0F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Ninth Circuit did not hold that the covid shot was not a vaccine. It held that the Plaintiffs adequately pleaded (in their Complaint) that it is not a vaccine and that this allegation, assumed to be true on a motion to dismiss, makes Jacobson distinguishable. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2024/06/07/22-55908.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799287758084841959
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4CE284A70254D19C7994A0C577621C475FE97BC48A7B9D961C4B92798DB5D0F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1717947382241
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17992877580848419594CE284A70254D19C7994A0C577621C475FE97BC48A7B9D961C4B92798DB5D0F6