Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-07 21:22:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DE18BC0E3F36F94B6619AA036A6AB3CF8B8B5B5621C99AFD73A075F5B6F79F4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The information in the note's sources all derive from what the NYT reported, which has been proved to be fabricated, as stated by the poster and the qrted post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799187123641172143
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DE18BC0E3F36F94B6619AA036A6AB3CF8B8B5B5621C99AFD73A075F5B6F79F4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1717795353116
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799187123641172143DE18BC0E3F36F94B6619AA036A6AB3CF8B8B5B5621C99AFD73A075F5B6F79F4D