Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-09 10:53:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C05A90802201E2E59E4346DE9FCA218EE42826C138602E4622F6F716D67F47A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The information in the note's sources all derive from what the NYT reported, which has been proved to be fabricated, as stated by the poster and the qrted post.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799187123641172143
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0C05A90802201E2E59E4346DE9FCA218EE42826C138602E4622F6F716D67F47A
  • createdAtMillis - 1717930413032
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17991871236411721430C05A90802201E2E59E4346DE9FCA218EE42826C138602E4622F6F716D67F47A