Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-07 21:30:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 45C54E2903EF4058DB662E46853EC8D803CA99CF0AD7E3F7C43E9D0E015644A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

La acción de amparo rechazada no fue presentada por su defensa ni nadie en su representación. La acción fue presentada por un abogado (Julio Cuadros Castillo) a titulo personal. https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:VA6C2:4b081df4-9747-41d2-8699-bba029bce121

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799122729150324972
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 45C54E2903EF4058DB662E46853EC8D803CA99CF0AD7E3F7C43E9D0E015644A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1717795858752
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179912272915032497245C54E2903EF4058DB662E46853EC8D803CA99CF0AD7E3F7C43E9D0E015644A5