Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-07 16:01:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5CC38F3B5A1EDC38B3C4AAC419B32192F835D95728D4DC9D288560B8345E9EA2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Some cite the FD article for "proof" a certain mail exists, and whether or not it does, that doesn't diminish the fact that Plasterk did not share it with NRC as he claims. Meaning, the factual statement by tweet's author, a NRC journalist reporting on this matter, is true.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799095795335024912
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5CC38F3B5A1EDC38B3C4AAC419B32192F835D95728D4DC9D288560B8345E9EA2
  • createdAtMillis - 1717776074325
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17990957953350249125CC38F3B5A1EDC38B3C4AAC419B32192F835D95728D4DC9D288560B8345E9EA2