Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-12 06:47:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5114085F540AE8F84C3AD46D5C45A928062B48C2AE1491C6D2DC18818D2F7E05
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Some cite the FD article for "proof" a certain mail exists, and whether or not it does, that doesn't diminish the fact that Plasterk did not share it with NRC as he claims. Meaning, the factual statement by tweet's author, a NRC journalist reporting on this matter, is true.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799095795335024912
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5114085F540AE8F84C3AD46D5C45A928062B48C2AE1491C6D2DC18818D2F7E05
  • createdAtMillis - 1718174867698
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17990957953350249125114085F540AE8F84C3AD46D5C45A928062B48C2AE1491C6D2DC18818D2F7E05