Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-07 15:50:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D97DB68002C4DA65F102C86AAA53DEB116B21631F4F127D4FD39F8D4763D3FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Some cite the FD article for "proof" a certain mail exists, and whether or not it does, that doesn't diminish the fact that Plasterk did not share it with NRC as he claims. Meaning, the factual statement by tweet's author, a NRC journalist reporting on this matter, is true.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799095795335024912
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D97DB68002C4DA65F102C86AAA53DEB116B21631F4F127D4FD39F8D4763D3FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1717775455213
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17990957953350249123D97DB68002C4DA65F102C86AAA53DEB116B21631F4F127D4FD39F8D4763D3FE