Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-07 13:47:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B105E64D8D522F76175B9A06E247D31D3079DF2F0760390FFDE1BF270EF58D80
Participant Details

Original Note:

To note 1798990687284989987. Although you are correct in a literal fashion, we can infer from the emotional context of the tweet that it's an approximation. Your note would be better suited to the comments. The tweet is [mostly] factually correct.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799049336313016536
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B105E64D8D522F76175B9A06E247D31D3079DF2F0760390FFDE1BF270EF58D80
  • createdAtMillis - 1717768049242
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1799049336313016536B105E64D8D522F76175B9A06E247D31D3079DF2F0760390FFDE1BF270EF58D80