Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-07 12:47:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 28F7A37D895D1AAE2972131F4FFD2100375CABBC581D4DDFC3AFEC4252151CFF
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP is not implying the Bannon conviction is for election interference. It is implying that the whole prosecution of Bannon was for the purpose of interfering with the 2024 election. This is OP's opinion. Therefore, no CN is needed. Use "replies" to comment on OP. https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1798755482515255551

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1799040641168724027
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 28F7A37D895D1AAE2972131F4FFD2100375CABBC581D4DDFC3AFEC4252151CFF
  • createdAtMillis - 1717764467238
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 179904064116872402728F7A37D895D1AAE2972131F4FFD2100375CABBC581D4DDFC3AFEC4252151CFF