Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-07 11:04:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 90D6146474C6CBF2C7AE5D2AA69E34B0F8097AD7A591FBB661BD91B95D05CD21
Participant Details

Original Note:

Neither JK Rowling nor any of her public statements were mentioned at any part of this court case nor in the sentencing hearing. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/R-v-X-and-Y-Ruling-on-reporting-restrictions.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798978092909957412
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 90D6146474C6CBF2C7AE5D2AA69E34B0F8097AD7A591FBB661BD91B95D05CD21
  • createdAtMillis - 1717758247159
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179897809290995741290D6146474C6CBF2C7AE5D2AA69E34B0F8097AD7A591FBB661BD91B95D05CD21