Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-07 04:24:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DBA1E1C6EC2DCC5613AD7A311408B590898EDFFD7F83CD510AB14D343EB6523C
Participant Details

Original Note:

被告の犯行は猟奇的である事に変わりありませんが、被害者の行いを「ちょっかい」の一言だけで終わらせることは出来ません。被告は被害者に避妊せずに性行為をされた。修被告と浩子被告は2度目の再会を望んでおらず被害者男性に懇願したが拒否された。など重要な背景にも注視が必要です。 https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/b4634ef42051026080d3a64a2adbfce3266da00e

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798849596887797833
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DBA1E1C6EC2DCC5613AD7A311408B590898EDFFD7F83CD510AB14D343EB6523C
  • createdAtMillis - 1717734254880
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1798849596887797833DBA1E1C6EC2DCC5613AD7A311408B590898EDFFD7F83CD510AB14D343EB6523C