Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-06 19:47:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A65C535F07A88A23D5E1F3B475EFC92A23926C18DA0CC358C3DA054C7459886
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet presents one point of view in a contested scientific topic. There are no grounds, as it is, to start ruling out entire view points without ruining the whole scientific process thing along the way. Debate in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798789812914409519
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A65C535F07A88A23D5E1F3B475EFC92A23926C18DA0CC358C3DA054C7459886
  • createdAtMillis - 1717703261449
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17987898129144095192A65C535F07A88A23D5E1F3B475EFC92A23926C18DA0CC358C3DA054C7459886