Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-06 22:04:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4562541D2E6E06B36B72B3517769966BA0AB6C2F99B1F2727EF0C0FDFBA1E38A
Participant Details

Original Note:

È una domanda , una provocazione che non c'entra nulla con la nota precedente. Inoltre nuovi studi dimostrano la possibilità che la COVID-19 sia di origine artificiale. Inoltre nel.primo link indicato lo studio dimostra la mano degli scienziati già dal 2015 https://www.wallstreetitalia.com/mercati-che-fare/il-coronavirus-un-virus-artificiale-dice-un-nuovo-studio/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798756547327414412
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4562541D2E6E06B36B72B3517769966BA0AB6C2F99B1F2727EF0C0FDFBA1E38A
  • createdAtMillis - 1717711490121
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17987565473274144124562541D2E6E06B36B72B3517769966BA0AB6C2F99B1F2727EF0C0FDFBA1E38A