Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-07 03:26:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5FC4454D83A072EF9F729A9A61FDA2FFB31B4AE422CE824C6E427937562BEC55
Participant Details

Original Note:

The controversy in ESG includes methodology and thus bias. There are 600 ESG ratings published globally with their own methodology, scoring, and target audiences. S&P, which is shown here, is one of many. S&P methodology is proprietary (p 4 in citation below). https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/documents/methodologies/methodology-sp-dji-esg-score.pdf https://frameworkesg.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/FWESG_RatingsRankings2021.pdf https://www.diligent.com/resources/blog/esg-risk-scores

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798649339411099829
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5FC4454D83A072EF9F729A9A61FDA2FFB31B4AE422CE824C6E427937562BEC55
  • createdAtMillis - 1717730766501
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17986493394110998295FC4454D83A072EF9F729A9A61FDA2FFB31B4AE422CE824C6E427937562BEC55