Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-07 13:32:29 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF16FCE0D91EECE01ADAD6C106DE7F4B9A2248EB00B27617FD20A970E665EDB4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Se rechazó el proyecto porque hay otro en puerta sobre el tema, y en el cual además se deben realizar consultas por un tratado internacional en materia de DDHH que por ley están obligados a seguir: https://x.com/scjn_clips/status/1798084506458702304

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798605444228727036
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF16FCE0D91EECE01ADAD6C106DE7F4B9A2248EB00B27617FD20A970E665EDB4
  • createdAtMillis - 1717767149234
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1798605444228727036EF16FCE0D91EECE01ADAD6C106DE7F4B9A2248EB00B27617FD20A970E665EDB4