Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-06 16:11:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AE110F3270C0FB4B9460D22B9F97E8C2850E9E80BA6AD9881BEE4B8170602B11
Participant Details

Original Note:

Se rechazó el proyecto porque hay otro en puerta sobre el tema, y en el cual además se deben realizar consultas por un tratado internacional en materia de DDHH que por ley están obligados a seguir: https://x.com/scjn_clips/status/1798084506458702304

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798605444228727036
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AE110F3270C0FB4B9460D22B9F97E8C2850E9E80BA6AD9881BEE4B8170602B11
  • createdAtMillis - 1717690303866
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1798605444228727036AE110F3270C0FB4B9460D22B9F97E8C2850E9E80BA6AD9881BEE4B8170602B11