Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-08 09:16:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E4C192C53E5F66020D7AA463CF573B64A9E9B55E679701592F7EB5CF73758D4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Se rechazó el proyecto porque hay otro en puerta sobre el tema, y en el cual además se deben realizar consultas por un tratado internacional en materia de DDHH que por ley están obligados a seguir: https://x.com/scjn_clips/status/1798084506458702304

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798605444228727036
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E4C192C53E5F66020D7AA463CF573B64A9E9B55E679701592F7EB5CF73758D4
  • createdAtMillis - 1717838207251
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17986054442287270364E4C192C53E5F66020D7AA463CF573B64A9E9B55E679701592F7EB5CF73758D4