Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-06 07:21:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 26C8CB80963C4D4C44FAD89A92FC28519FA39B7A49F4BC03A125E01191203206
Participant Details

Original Note:

Puberty blockers were not 'suddenly banned'. Following the 4-year Cass Review, they were temporarily restricted because of the lack of evidence for any benefit. The Good Law Project has a history of using issues like this to fundraise for questionable legal challenges https://thecritic.co.uk/bad-law-project/ https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-the-good-law-project-lost-again/ https://davidallengreen.com/2022/10/the-good-law-project-has-had-another-bad-day-in-court-but-this-decision-raises-serious-questions-about-enforcing-the-public-element-of-public-procurement/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798582200125776314
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 26C8CB80963C4D4C44FAD89A92FC28519FA39B7A49F4BC03A125E01191203206
  • createdAtMillis - 1717658479555
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179858220012577631426C8CB80963C4D4C44FAD89A92FC28519FA39B7A49F4BC03A125E01191203206