Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-06 17:33:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F5769680C4B6A3613C9A1E2CC864DFE07410F8D9D2559E911EF78F4432045713
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge, defense and prosecution participated in voir dire and the jury + alternates were agreed upon. The jury (who represented a cross-section of the community where the crimes were committed) decided the verdict, based on evidence presented by both sides. https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/jury-service/juror-selection-process

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798467598259982830
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F5769680C4B6A3613C9A1E2CC864DFE07410F8D9D2559E911EF78F4432045713
  • createdAtMillis - 1717695210665
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1798467598259982830F5769680C4B6A3613C9A1E2CC864DFE07410F8D9D2559E911EF78F4432045713