Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-10 17:54:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6AE9DD1CF2BCBC3D0395D68D17150961A497093A24C4181DFD9613D259B35F02
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge, defense and prosecution participated in voir dire and the jury + alternates were agreed upon. The jury (who represented a cross-section of the community where the crimes were committed) decided the verdict, based on evidence presented by both sides. https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/jury-service/juror-selection-process

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798467598259982830
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6AE9DD1CF2BCBC3D0395D68D17150961A497093A24C4181DFD9613D259B35F02
  • createdAtMillis - 1718042097078
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17984675982599828306AE9DD1CF2BCBC3D0395D68D17150961A497093A24C4181DFD9613D259B35F02