Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-06 04:09:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A85C9DD560E53A7950FDF3B8C383A1A6DBB351E31B15D4FEB1EE2F678D5B1EBE
Participant Details

Original Note:

(1) The tweet itself is factually correct, it doesn’t make any claim about why the article was taken down (2) The proposed note is incorrect about why—the linked daily beast article does not claim the article has any lies

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798467553959751801
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A85C9DD560E53A7950FDF3B8C383A1A6DBB351E31B15D4FEB1EE2F678D5B1EBE
  • createdAtMillis - 1717646984268
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1798467553959751801A85C9DD560E53A7950FDF3B8C383A1A6DBB351E31B15D4FEB1EE2F678D5B1EBE