Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-06 08:32:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6705F88E1418C10C4B649E421E36B487973EE4D17C671946ABCFF5FEB9C644E1
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'article cite un unique scientifique qui critique cette série. https://www.leparisien.fr/culture-loisirs/cest-une-honte-la-communaute-scientifique-sinsurge-apres-la-sortie-du-film-sous-la-seine-sur-netflix-05-06-2024-7WOUPTZ4ABHRNOH4A6MYH4XZPE.php La communauté scientifique ne publie pas de travaux concernant la qualité ou la légitimité d'œuvres de fiction.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798459295396241582
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6705F88E1418C10C4B649E421E36B487973EE4D17C671946ABCFF5FEB9C644E1
  • createdAtMillis - 1717662779743
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17984592953962415826705F88E1418C10C4B649E421E36B487973EE4D17C671946ABCFF5FEB9C644E1