Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-06 09:08:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB0FA7E91942E497EEAC1FF3F3CE20D027C2DFF1C7F7313043D6E1DE0BE954D5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Este es un caso de la falacia "tu quoque" (tu tambiĆ©n) en la que incurre el periodista al intentar desacreditar un discurso porque quien lo pronuncia incurriĆ³ en el mal que critica, en lugar de detenerse en el fundamento del discurso. https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798427152540398011
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EB0FA7E91942E497EEAC1FF3F3CE20D027C2DFF1C7F7313043D6E1DE0BE954D5
  • createdAtMillis - 1717664895286
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1798427152540398011EB0FA7E91942E497EEAC1FF3F3CE20D027C2DFF1C7F7313043D6E1DE0BE954D5