Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-06 16:34:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D181E680338218631539F6B38C7CDDC8A720ABFAF5075445004DDA7F958D5565
Participant Details

Original Note:

Este es un caso de la falacia "tu quoque" (tu tambiĆ©n) en la que incurre el periodista al intentar desacreditar un discurso porque quien lo pronuncia incurriĆ³ en el mal que critica, en lugar de detenerse en el fundamento del discurso. https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798427152540398011
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D181E680338218631539F6B38C7CDDC8A720ABFAF5075445004DDA7F958D5565
  • createdAtMillis - 1717691684059
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1798427152540398011D181E680338218631539F6B38C7CDDC8A720ABFAF5075445004DDA7F958D5565