Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-06 11:26:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5212BEA7CB500942FD633EE0125484FFD85F295D45EE2793CDD6C3D908E90FB2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN-The main issue with non-scientific and (sadly) scientific people is that they do not think critically. Whatever is published, they treat this publication as something saint, without a critical evaluation of the paper published. Such people are a threat to the actual science.https://library.lsbu.ac.uk/evaluating_resources/journals

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798345615216185437
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5212BEA7CB500942FD633EE0125484FFD85F295D45EE2793CDD6C3D908E90FB2
  • createdAtMillis - 1717673178652
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17983456152161854375212BEA7CB500942FD633EE0125484FFD85F295D45EE2793CDD6C3D908E90FB2