Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-06-05 14:51:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F8788B3E2DF5C812963986E2EF14A33E0D9B9E886E4ECC9CD88A7D1A3581256C
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN - The suggested Notes fail to address the original post. The OP does not claim that the figures are solely based on civil service estimates. Instead, it cites genuine articles from British newspapers. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/labour-increase-tax-bill-protect-cash/ https://public.conservatives.com/publicweb/Labour-tax-rises.pdf https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13320995/amp/Rachel-Reeves-tax-tsar-claimed-pensioners-ridiculously-good-said-taxed-more.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/rachel-reeves-fought-slash-pension-tax-breaks-high-earners/ https://www.civilserviceworld.com/professions/article/hmrc-labour-expert-panel-modernise-tax-compliance-edward-troup-margaret-hodge https://www.ft.com/content/11e3c349-c1cc-4356-9911-691bc6f0cb17 https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/press-releases/pensioners-gain-1000-on-average-from-policy-changes-since-2010-with-tax-rises-this-parliament-offset-by-triple-lock-boost-for-all-but-the-richest-pensioners/
All Note Details