Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-06-05 18:38:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F652D1E4C43BE362A8B905C84CFA9EF1F3E021471895F9F112D48688AB344803
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN - The suggested Notes fail to address the original post. The OP does not claim that the figures are solely based on civil service estimates. Instead, it cites genuine articles from British newspapers. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/labour-increase-tax-bill-protect-cash/ https://public.conservatives.com/publicweb/Labour-tax-rises.pdf https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13320995/amp/Rachel-Reeves-tax-tsar-claimed-pensioners-ridiculously-good-said-taxed-more.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/rachel-reeves-fought-slash-pension-tax-breaks-high-earners/ https://www.civilserviceworld.com/professions/article/hmrc-labour-expert-panel-modernise-tax-compliance-edward-troup-margaret-hodge https://www.ft.com/content/11e3c349-c1cc-4356-9911-691bc6f0cb17 https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/press-releases/pensioners-gain-1000-on-average-from-policy-changes-since-2010-with-tax-rises-this-parliament-offset-by-triple-lock-boost-for-all-but-the-richest-pensioners/
All Note Details