Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-06-06 06:00:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B3497C6D4CAB4CAB7F2B40210BCFB1E30F497B520198AE44F8F97ADE99922953
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN - The suggested Notes fail to address the original post. The OP does not claim that the figures are solely based on civil service estimates. Instead, it cites genuine articles from British newspapers. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/labour-increase-tax-bill-protect-cash/ https://public.conservatives.com/publicweb/Labour-tax-rises.pdf https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13320995/amp/Rachel-Reeves-tax-tsar-claimed-pensioners-ridiculously-good-said-taxed-more.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/rachel-reeves-fought-slash-pension-tax-breaks-high-earners/ https://www.civilserviceworld.com/professions/article/hmrc-labour-expert-panel-modernise-tax-compliance-edward-troup-margaret-hodge https://www.ft.com/content/11e3c349-c1cc-4356-9911-691bc6f0cb17 https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/press-releases/pensioners-gain-1000-on-average-from-policy-changes-since-2010-with-tax-rises-this-parliament-offset-by-triple-lock-boost-for-all-but-the-richest-pensioners/
All Note Details