Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-05 10:21:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9084F8ED45A55363034427F7D143D55E28F39674B22D391F70BE8D2EB1E1A935
Participant Details

Original Note:

Whilst the claim shouldn't be presented as if it's from a treasury analysis, the individual figures used to arrive at the figure were, in the main, treasury figures. https://public.conservatives.com/publicweb/Labour-tax-rises.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798279644145180994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9084F8ED45A55363034427F7D143D55E28F39674B22D391F70BE8D2EB1E1A935
  • createdAtMillis - 1717582894771
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17982796441451809949084F8ED45A55363034427F7D143D55E28F39674B22D391F70BE8D2EB1E1A935