Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-05 09:31:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 75D612C7FBE85C1D2E266FF8C4D49A5C65E1D343AFE92223532E721BBB810C39
Participant Details

Original Note:

Whilst the claim shouldn't be presented as if it's from a treasury analysis, the individual figures used to arrive at the figure were, in the main, treasury figures. https://public.conservatives.com/publicweb/Labour-tax-rises.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798279644145180994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 75D612C7FBE85C1D2E266FF8C4D49A5C65E1D343AFE92223532E721BBB810C39
  • createdAtMillis - 1717579895318
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 179827964414518099475D612C7FBE85C1D2E266FF8C4D49A5C65E1D343AFE92223532E721BBB810C39