Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-05 12:29:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8F4ECFA279E5CEF25F7FC248A73FEE943F221B58B07D5D59E2481957EE66A488
Participant Details

Original Note:

Might be satire but this is an example of non sequitur (aka formal fallacy). The conclusion does not follow logically from the premises. The fact that there were many survivors does not logically relate to or negate the severity of the event. https://www.grammarly.com/blog/non-sequitur/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798250872226333096
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8F4ECFA279E5CEF25F7FC248A73FEE943F221B58B07D5D59E2481957EE66A488
  • createdAtMillis - 1717590584042
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17982508722263330968F4ECFA279E5CEF25F7FC248A73FEE943F221B58B07D5D59E2481957EE66A488