Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-05 13:01:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CFA02E53FA93C2F349C2B2A2A3BDF3856BB6F53E7B1B6D859BF1459C40A71E67
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no data or source to the "poll" being referred here. Coming from a influential account, this may be misleading. Similarly, some other sources can be cited saying Trump is stronger after this verdict. Hence, such generalizations are risky. https://www.conservativehq.com/post/trump-stronger-after-conviction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1798225143812039045
participantId -
raterParticipantId - CFA02E53FA93C2F349C2B2A2A3BDF3856BB6F53E7B1B6D859BF1459C40A71E67
createdAtMillis - 1717592477866
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1798225143812039045CFA02E53FA93C2F349C2B2A2A3BDF3856BB6F53E7B1B6D859BF1459C40A71E67