Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-05 12:44:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57460F67C475F68D05E675C3042325C6AD821B7E2ACA6EE63C09D84CC81DA99E
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no data or source to the "poll" being referred here. Coming from a influential account, this may be misleading. Similarly, some other sources can be cited saying Trump is stronger after this verdict. Hence, such generalizations are risky. https://www.conservativehq.com/post/trump-stronger-after-conviction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798225143812039045
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 57460F67C475F68D05E675C3042325C6AD821B7E2ACA6EE63C09D84CC81DA99E
  • createdAtMillis - 1717591464675
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 179822514381203904557460F67C475F68D05E675C3042325C6AD821B7E2ACA6EE63C09D84CC81DA99E