Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-05 12:50:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1DAB3E9CCE61AF0CAA988975A210EF62C221DC83B7016929142D340CFEEBCB97
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no data or source to the "poll" being referred here. Coming from a influential account, this may be misleading. Similarly, some other sources can be cited saying Trump is stronger after this verdict. Hence, such generalizations are risky. https://www.conservativehq.com/post/trump-stronger-after-conviction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798225143812039045
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1DAB3E9CCE61AF0CAA988975A210EF62C221DC83B7016929142D340CFEEBCB97
  • createdAtMillis - 1717591859057
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17982251438120390451DAB3E9CCE61AF0CAA988975A210EF62C221DC83B7016929142D340CFEEBCB97