Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-06 03:15:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0104B118D1642AF0F67098C6096A0EA6D3F04A296D27B339251AB93154A5CEED
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no data or source to the "poll" being referred here. Coming from a influential account, this may be misleading. Similarly, some other sources can be cited saying Trump is stronger after this verdict. Hence, such generalizations are risky. https://www.conservativehq.com/post/trump-stronger-after-conviction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1798225143812039045
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0104B118D1642AF0F67098C6096A0EA6D3F04A296D27B339251AB93154A5CEED
  • createdAtMillis - 1717643704917
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17982251438120390450104B118D1642AF0F67098C6096A0EA6D3F04A296D27B339251AB93154A5CEED